Presidential and Parliamentary government
by:Krisna Mendoza
The legislative and the executive are elected
independently of each other. Two distinct features of the presidential system:
The first one parties are often more loosely organized than in parliamentary
systems. Second, there is no
guarantee that President’s party will also control the legislative.
One representative is the US Congress has two houses: the House of
Representatives and the Senate. Leaders of each are elected by the party that
has majority in the house, the committee chairs are appointed from the members
of the majority party. Seniority is the principle here. In a parliamentary
system, members vote along the party lines, this does not necessarily need to
happen in a presidential system.
Policy Leadership, presidents take more direct personal charge of policy
than the cabinet does in a parliamentary system. The majority party and the
cabinet are a team in a parliamentary system. But the president is directly elected
by the people. Unlike parliamentary cabinets, the presidential cabinet does not
contain party notables. The president is also the head of the army. Responsibility
for policy is more difficult to identify in a presidential system because it is
hard to blame anyone like the President, the Congress or the Supreme Court.
It is hard to understand policies in a presidential system than in a
parliamentary system because a bill can be blocked at any stage in a
presidential system, the governments are relatively slow to respond. In the parliamentary system, almost
all the leaders come from careers in the parliament/politics. In a presidential
system the President and his cabinet may have different backgrounds.
Parliamentary
system the Prime Minister and ministers regularly report to the parliament. In
a presidential system the members of the executive operate relatively isolated.
The executive is split into the Prime Minister and the cabinet, but these
functions are united in the President in a presidential system. Some
parliamentary systems have monarchs, Kings and Queens, however they have symbolic
functions.
Parliamentary systems are simpler, more
direct, and usually more efficient to make policies. However, there are other factors like the history, the
culture, and the cleavages in the country. There are hostile parties in a
country, it is hard to maintain stability. Then one can argue that it is better
to have a presidential system. Presidential systems are also efficient for large
countries. So it depends, there are a lot of factors to consider. In
the US, the Supreme Court
resolves the disputes between various power holders. 9 people can annul acts of
Presidents and the laws passed by the Congress.
Greenstein views leadership is a function
of six qualities. Proficiency as a public communicator. Organizational
capacity. Political skill to get other people to do what he wanted. Having an
overarching goal and the ability to see how specific policies would help bring
about that goal. The ability to process the torrent of advice and information
that president receives on every issue. The ability to manage his emotions and
turn them to constructive purposes, rather than being dominated by them and
allowing them to diminish his leadership.
Parliamentary
systems are simpler, more direct, and usually more efficient to make policies. The legislative and the executive are elected
independently of each other. Policy
Leadership, presidents take more direct personal charge of policy than
the cabinet does in a parliamentary system. Stage in a presidential system, the
governments are relatively slow to respond.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario